Good morning....just wondering if any others diagnosed with RA are choosing NOT to treat. I was diagnosed 6 yrs ago and have been on multiple biologics....started with DMARDS as is standard, moved on to Biologics and because I couldn't see any measurable difference, a year ago I opted not to treat and save my exorbitant co-pays. I am Sero-Negative RA so we can't even measure progress with labs....EXCEPT for the Vectra DA which IS showing higher disease activity. I'm not suffering...don't have the arthritis piece, labs look wonderful, but I'm tired.....veeerrrry tired. Anyone else in the same 'boat'? The drs say these drugs in my case would be for preventing future damage....but if you can't measure progress, and you don't feel different WITH the meds, is it worth the risk of the side effects? Looking for new perspective if anyone can offer one. Thanks! Pauline